Видео

Yes Cynthia! All Glory to God! Yeshua HaMashiach Elohenu! C.G.

If you watched the service you would have heard me say to our guests to NOT give anything. We say this every single worship day. Every time. We are not a money-grubbing church, in any way whatsoever. That info in the waiting period of the Live Stream is because people ALL OVER THE WORLD are always asking how they can give. So that info is there for anyone who needs/wants it. But that's it. So...I think that is a VERY good start. Did you watch the service? Did you hear me tell the guests not to give? Did you listen to the message? It might have been for you? ;-) God bless you Wendy.... Pastor C.G.

Thank you, Child of God.....May the Lord bless you and keep you always. Praise Yeshua. C.G.

Amen! C.G.

Thank you Gina for the question...Here's what I say, preach, teach, write, and do media interviews on - for almost 40 years. Also the anti-christ is a person and their is a "spirit" (demonic outpouring) of antichrist as well. Read 1 John. It answers this question and is the only book in the whole Bible that uses the term "antichrist." God bless you - I hope this and what is below helps you. Pastor CG. ========================================= "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Even those who insist that there was a "theologian or two" who taught pre-trib in the first several hundred years of the early church, overlook the fact that EACH of those who did so were called "heretics" by the bulk of early theologians! That is because they knew what Jesus taught and what Peter, James, and John taught - and from where they got their teachings. They got it from Jesus - plain and simple, in black and white. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

Thanks for your reply ​@@carlgallups

@@ginalowe1924 You are more than welcome, Gina! God bless you. C.G.

Where does it say that. What is the context? How does He define the temple He will rebuild? If you don't know...I can steer you to those scriptures. I'm not sure from your brief statement, exactlly where you are trying to go. Blessings. C.G.

@carlgallups Zechariah 6-12 and he himself the branch will rebuild temple something like that I heard it from a preacher can you pls tell me when you find verse

@@revalationrevaltion9291 - Here's the thing my brother/sister? EVERYTHING concerning the last days that's said in the OT MUST be interpreted in light of the NT revelation - especially whatever Jesus says about fulfillment. Paul as well (he wrote HALF the NT!). The truth is there is NOWHERE in the Bible that, in context, speaks of Yeshua rebuilding a literal temple on the temple mount in downtown Jerusalem. NOWHERE. However, Paul says 9 times in the NT that the new temple is US, we are the "naos/debir/miqdash" of God. The ONLY ONLY ONLY place in the New Testament where it black and white speaks of a new Temple in the last days being built is in Ephesians 2. Paul says that the Jew and Gentile under the blood of YEshua become the One New Man and are being "built together" into a "holy Temple" of God. Go read that chapter - you'll see. Jesus said he is "greater" than the Temple - and that he would "rebuild" it in 3 days as he pointed to Himself. The verse after that goes on to say that Yeshua was talking about His resurrection and that IS the Temple. Now - there is no Temple, and a 3rd one will NOT be built on the Temple Mount - again, NOWHERE in the Old or New testament, in context, does it say that. I pray this helps. You can get my book EYES TO SEE and you will have all the scripture and scholarship and word studies at your fingertips. Also Messianic Rabbi Zev Porat's book UNMASKING THE CHALDEAN spirit. You can get both of them (and many more) at www.carlgallups.com/store. God bless you. Pastor C.G.

@carlgallups thank you so much love list watching you guys I miss Tom horn ♥️ from a sad woke Australia

!אתה מוזמן, ישוע יברך אותך בעושר - - - Pastor C.G.

Correct, SpotterVideo! I preached on this very thing just a few Lord's Day back. You might find it interesting and helpful. ruclips.net/video/bOE2f17quRo/видео.html Here's the problem with the modern church, "Holding to your traditions, you nulify the Word of God!" Sound familiar? LOL! Shalom aleichem B'Yeshua HaMashiach Adonai! C.G.

@@carlgallups Brother, I did hear the recent sermon you preached about the New Covenant at your church. It was fantastic and much needed. Watch the video I produced titled "Genesis of Dispensational Theology" if you want to see the original source of this modern doctrine, which must ignore the New Covenant to work.

Gina. Except that NOWHERE ANYWHERE in the scripture is that scenario plainly stated. It's just not there. It's only there in the "traditions" of the pre-trib teachers. Read the material below. I pray it helps you in this matter. God bless - C.G. =============================================== "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Even those who insist that there was a "theologian or two" who taught pre-trib in the first several hundred years of the early church, overlook the fact that EACH of those who did so were called "heretics" by the bulk of early theologians! That is because they knew what Jesus taught and what Peter, James, and John taught - and from where they got their teachings. They got it from Jesus - plain and simple, in black and white. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

Thanks for your kind words Steve! Now to answer your question.... Yeshua says in the "holy place." The word "place" in Greek is topos (where we get our word topography). It speaks of a locale or region and is never, ever, used anywhere in the Greek for the Temple. Never. Anywhere! The Hebrew synonym for the GK topos is magom. It also is NEVER used for the temple on the temple mount. This is why Matthew 24 also say "Let the reader understand." At any rate this discussion is too lengthy to have on this forum - but if you'll get Messianic Rabbi Zev Porat's book Unmasking the Chaldean Spirit he has an entire section on your question. Daniel never uses the word "temple" in connection to the "abonation of desolation" in his writing. When you see it in the English texts as "temple" - that is an ADDED word of "translation commentary" - Daniel does not use that word, it's simply not there. Please get Zev's book. You'll be shocked. You've been under the pre-trib myth for a while, obviously,. My teaching here in this video at Skywatch is actually spot on with the Hebrew and Greek words for Temple and what Paul says about it. Neither Paul, Jesus, or any of the NT writers EVER EVER EVER say there will be a new literal third temple on the temple mount in the last days. NONE of them said it. Think on that. It would have been so easy for any of them to just black and white say it - but when you know the Greek and Hebrew, you discover that they didn't even come close to saying that. In fact, Paul literally says what the new temple of the last days is! Read Ephesians 2 again. God bless you Robert. - C.G. =============================================== "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

@@carlgallups Dear brother, thank you so much for taking the time and depth to answer my question. First, I am delighted to converse with you. I’ve been in the sky watch camp now for around 14 years. It has been a wonderful journey. I have always enjoyed your teaching and have heard you on just about every platform that you’ve aired on. I respect your vast knowledge of Hebrew and Greek and I depend on men like you and Dr. Michael Heisner who have done so much to reveal what in reality is hidden truth. As you detected, I was raised a southern Baptist well-versed in traditional eschatology, and pre-trib rapture. I was drawn to the prophetic books as a young man and read Daniel over and over along with Math 24 & Luke 17,Rev etc. I’ve always had trouble with the pre-trib view because of several scriptures one in particular when Daniel talks about Him being given power to war with the saints and prevailing over them. I was delighted to learn that your books are on Audible and I will begin getting them starting with this one. I’m an avid reader, but I don’t have time to read so I find audible a wonderful alternative as I spend much time driving for work. Thank you for mentioning Dr. Reagan’s work as well as the other references. I will copy and paste your comment so that I can study it further. I agree with your view that the church is not ready for our Lord‘s return. I was talking to a brother the other day. I think he was a brother lol and when I mentioned Jesus returning, he was like he said “well I hope not.” inferring that it would mess up his plans. Thank you so much for taking the time and clarifying for me what the words really mean and the context. It makes all the difference and I have challenged myself long ago to let go of sacred cows and traditions of men, and I constantly reach for clarity and ask the Lord to lead me into all truth. Wow I never thought I would be conversing with Carl Gallups. Thank you.

@@stevehelm9259 You are more than welcome brother! Thank you for taking the time to read my explanation. It says nothing other than what the BIble clearly, contextually, and linguistically says. You are such a gracious and intelligent man, Steve. I pray you we have chance to meet some day soon. In the meantime, may the Lord bless you and keep you always - and Shalom aleichem! B'Yeshua HaMashiach Adonai! (May the Peace of God surround you! In the Lord Jesus Christ!) C.G.

Thank you ALLME! All praise to Yeshua and His Word! God bless. C.G.

My brother. I'm afraid you have been theologically misled by the pre-trib teaching. Yes, Daniel does say that - BUT BUT BUT....he is specifically talking about the END TIME! And the New Testament gives us the interpretation of the fulfilment of the end times! EVERY seminary student is taught the huge principle that when interpreting the Old Testament texts that speak of the last days they MUST MUST MUST be interpreted in light of the New Testament truths, especially those preached by Jesus and Paul. In the teaching of the video here, you've heard (I pray you listened to all of it!) what Paul CLEARLY and contextually says about the Temple! In regards to the "daily sacrifices" of the last days read Romans 12:1-4. PAUL himself, who tells us what the last days "temple" is truly going to be (Ephesians 2) - also tells us what the "daily sacrifices:" (Tamid Sacrifices in Hebrew) are going to be. THAT is the proper interpretation of Daniel. The pre-trib teaching (which is horrible exegesis and contextual interpretation) goes completely askew of proper biblical interpretation - an interpretation invented in the 1800s. PLEASE read the below explanation. ===================================== "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

You are so welcome, GLF2424! God bless you for your kind words. I will pray for you and your ministry efforts of ministry and for your healing. You can also get all my books at www.carlgallups.com/store. They are priced at or below anywhere else, plus you can talk to a real person and get very personal service and you'll get the book(s)within just a couple of days. Plus, I'll sign it for you if you want. Just a thought. At any rate, I'm honored by what you wrote. All praise to Yeshua! Pastor C.G.

Yes my brother! And YOU shouldn't dismiss the contexutally connected and explained Word of God by holding to "traditions of men" - which is exactly what pre-trib teaching is. It absolutely butchers the context of God's Word and calls Jesus, the early church preaching, and the NT writers liars. Please read the explanation below. ========================== "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Even those who insist that there was a "theologian or two" who taught pre-trib in the first several hundred years of the early church, overlook the fact that EACH of those who did so were called "heretics" by the bulk of early theologians! That is because they knew what Jesus taught and what Peter, James, and John taught - and from where they got their teachings. They got it from Jesus - plain and simple, in black and white. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

@@carlgallups thanks for your reply, but I wasn't questioning the timing of the rapture. I actually embrace a pre-wrath being taken up.

@@kyleyoakum9383 Thanks Kyle. But exaclty WHAT were you questioning then?

@@carlgallups If I understand you correctly, I think you said that the Antichrist, man of sin, will not sit in the rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, but in the believers because Paul used the word temple previously as referring to the believers or the body of Christ. To me that would imply the man of sin would not refer to an actual person but a spirit dwelling in believers. Did I hear you correctly?

@@kyleyoakum9383First of all, I wish you had said that in the first place. LOL! :-) You heard me correctly - PARTLY. What I preach, teach, and write about concerning this (including in Eyes to See) is what the Bible contextually and clearly says. The Word of God speaks of the "antichrist spirit." 1 John speaks of "many antichrists" etc. Paul teaches that doctrines of demons will infest the church in the last days. Those demons work for Satan and so will the antichrist himself - eventually. Satan will "give him his power" (Rev. 13). So, it's both. We are now watching the doctrines of demons infest and destroy entire denominations throughout the US and the World. That's the "spirit" of antichrist - in the Naos, or Debir of God! But when antichrist comes in the flesh...with Satan's power....he will have a grip on the world (for a short while) and that will include the churches (that he so fervently hates) the Naos or Debir. But NOWHERE in the Bible, in context, does it say categorically that the antichrist will sit in a temple on the temple mount, ruling the world. NOWHERE. That is an invented tradition of the pretrib novelists and misquided "theologians." I pray this helps. God bless. C.G.

Except that your opinion does not line up with the contextual Word of God. Nothing in the Word of God speaks of such an event. It is an opinion. But, I sincerely thank you for listening to the program (I pray you did!). God bless. C.G.

@@carlgallups There are some things that are not covered in the "Word of God", that is why is prefaced with "In My Opinion" IMO. Qumran still has some secrets to reveal in addition to the DSS. 1 Corinthians 2.16

Robert, Yeshua never says "in the holy of holies". Never. He says in the holy place. The word "place" in Greek is topos (where we get our word topography). It speaks of a locale or region and is never used anywhere in the Greek for the Temple. The Hebrew synonym is magom. It also is NEVER used for the temple on the temple mount. This is why Matthew 24 also say "Let the reader understand." At any rate this discussion is too lengthy to have on this forum - but if you'll get Messianic Rabbi Zev Porat's book Unmasking the Chaldean Spirit he has an entire section on your question. Daniel never uses the word "temple" in connection to the "abonation of desolation" in his writing. When you see it in the English texts as "temple" - that is an ADDED word of "translation commentary" - Daniel does not use that word, it's simply not there. Please get Zev's book. You'll be shocked. You've been under the pre-trib myth for a while, obviously,. My teaching here in this video at Skywatch is actually spot on with the Hebrew and Greek words for Temple and what Paul says about it. Neither Paul, Jesus, or any of the NT writers EVER EVER EVER say there will be a new literal third temple on the temple mount in the last days. NONE of them said it. Think on that. It would have been so easy for any of them to just black and white say it - but when you know the Greek and Hebrew, you discover that they didn't even come close to saying that. In fact, Paul literally says what the new temple of the last days is! Read Ephesians 2 again. God bless you Robert. - C.G. =============================================== "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

You obviously didn't listen to the entire teaching on this. I spent the entire time building to that very verse - the conclusion is undeniable and thoroughlly biblical according to all biblical scholarhip of any credibility at all. Please go back and listen again from 8:45 - 19:51, then you will know the truth - and NOT the "traditions of men." ====================================== "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Even those who insist that there was a "theologian or two" who taught pre-trib in the first several hundred years of the early church, overlook the fact that EACH of those who did so were called "heretics" by the bulk of early theologians! That is because they knew what Jesus taught and what Peter, James, and John taught - and from where they got their teachings. They got it from Jesus - plain and simple, in black and white. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

@jcschnei64 Yeshua never says "in the holy of holies". Never. He says in the "holy place." The word "place" in Greek is topos (where we get our word topography). It speaks of a locale or region and is never, ever, is used anywhere in the Greek for the Temple. The Hebrew synonym is magom. It also is NEVER used for the temple on the temple mount. This is why Matthew 24 also say "Let the reader understand." At any rate this discussion is too lengthy to have on this forum - but if you'll get Messianic Rabbi Zev Porat's book Unmasking the Chaldean Spirit he has an entire section on your question. Daniel never uses the word "temple" in connection to the "abonation of desolation" in his writing. When you see it in the English texts as "temple" - that is an ADDED word of "translation commentary" - Daniel does not use that word, it's simply not there. Please get Zev's book. You'll be shocked. You've been under the pre-trib myth for a while, obviously,. My teaching here in this video at Skywatch is actually spot on with the Hebrew and Greek words for Temple and what Paul says about it. Neither Paul, Jesus, or any of the NT writers EVER EVER EVER say there will be a new literal third temple on the temple mount in the last days. NONE of them said it. Think on that. It would have been so easy for any of them to just black and white say it - but when you know the Greek and Hebrew, you discover that they didn't even come close to saying that. In fact, Paul literally says what the new temple of the last days is! Read Ephesians 2 again. God bless you Robert. - C.G. =============================================== "By holding to the traditions of men, you nullify the Word of God" - Yeshua (Mark 7:8-13) ME: The rapture is Historic Premillennial (post-trib). Yeshua said so - in BLACK AND WHITE. Read on, for the truth. Read Luke 17 and Matthew 24. Two times, in two different places, speaking to two different audiences ... Jesus said His coming would be JUST LIKE the Days of Noah and JUST LIKE the Days of Lot. No pre-trib in either of those references. Noah and Sodom and Gomorrah are mentioned throughout the scriptures right up to the book of Revelation - so we have plenty of biblical references to come to the proper conclusion. Both Noah and Lot lived only in a post trib/pre-wrath scenario. The words "tribulation" and "wrath" are two different Greek words. They mean two different things altogether. Jesus said (in black and white language), "In this world YOU WILL HAVE tribulation." Paul said, "But we have NOT BEEN appointed to suffer God's Wrath." Tribulation is caused by the sinful world, our fallen nature, Satan's rule ("god of this age"). Wrath is the furious punishment and retribution Jesus brings on the unbelieving and evil world, concurrent with His return. Jesus was crystal clear. Read below for more stunning evidence.... DR. DAVID REAGAN: ============================= Dr. David Reagan (a premiere and staunch pre-tribulation rapture teacher) says: (From his book - WRATH and GLORY pp. 112 and 113) “The OLDEST VIEWPOINT [about the doctrine of the rapture] is called historic premillennialism (Post Tribulation-Pre Wrath). It is termed “historic” for two reasons: to differentiate it from modern premillennialism and to indicate that IT WAS THE HISTORIC POSITION OF THE EARLY CHURCH … This view is based on a LITERAL INTERPRETATION of what the Bible says will happen in the End Times. One of its distinctive features is that it places the Rapture of the Church AT THE END OF the Tribulation, combining it with the Second Coming as one event.” “This is the ONLY SYSTEMATIC VIEW of end-time events that existed during the first 300 years of the Church. … Justin Martyr, who was born in A.D. 100, went so far in his writings on the subject as to suggest that anyone with a different viewpoint was heretical. Those today who disagree with this view respond to the near unanimity of the early Church Fathers by saying they were simply wrong in their interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures.” “Yet their concept of end-time events should not be dismissed out of hand as crude or primitive, for anyone who has studied the prophetic Scriptures will have to admit that the Church Father’s viewpoint presents A PLAIN SENSE SUMMARY of the BIBLE'S TEACHINGS about the end times.” (Emphasis in ALL CAPS is mine) ========================== ME: Since this historical fact is well documented to be true - think for just a moment. The pastors of the VERY FIRST church were Peter, James, and John. So obviously they preached pre-wrath. And for 300 years thereafter from generation to generation this was ALL that was systematically preached regarding the last days. Where did Peter, James, and John get it from? They got it from Jesus Himself. There's no way around that fact. Then when compared with what Jesus clearly lays out in Luke 17 we see that this EXACTLY what Jesus taught on the subject. Thus - this is where I stand on eschatology - and have done so for over forty years of preaching, teaching, writing, research, and media appearances on this topic. No one yet has produced biblically exegetical, contextual, or historical evidence otherwise. NO ONE. I pray this helps! God bless. C.G. ALSO SEE THIS. ANOTHER SHOCKING ADMISSION from Dr. Reagan Patrick H. Perry: I have often posed this question to teachers and pastors who hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. Do you know of any verse or passage that states that the Lord will return before; Daniel’s 70th seven, the revealing of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation? To date, no one has been able to produce such a verse. Yet many continue to hold to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching in spite of the fact that they have no Word of God to support it. Some time ago, I attended a Prophecy Conference at the Hebron Christian Church near Athens, GA. The church hosted Dr. David Reagan from the Lion and Lamb Ministries of Dallas, Texas. Dr. Reagan made a shocking admission during one of his presentations. He said, “There is not one verse in the Bible which states that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation.” Dr. Reagan, however, continuously proclaims a Pre-Tribulation Rapture even though he admits there is no verse which states this position. Posted on line by Richard H. Perry at: www.lastdaysmystery.info/i_never_said_i_would_return_before_the_great_tribulation.htm

Bertgoat....Thanks for watching. Thanks for the question. Below is the answer..... God bless. Pastor C.G. "How can the covenant be refurbished when the word new is chadash, meaning new or recently new..." THIS IS HOW .... NOTE THE EMPHASIZED WORDS - all caps. Yeshua was the FULFILLMENT of everything about the Old Covenant. Hebrews 8 says it clearly - it even repeats the text of Jeremiah 31:31. My car illustration is the best way I know how to describe it. Messianic Rabbi Zev Porat (my Hebrew ministry partner) assures me that my interpretation is exactly as it is used even in modern Hebrew to this day. Especially in this context of Yeshua's fulfillment. I hope this helps. STRONG's 2319 Chadash Word Origin: Derived from the root חָדַשׁ (chadash), meaning "to RENEW" or "to REPAIR." Usage: The Hebrew word "chadash" primarily means "new" and is used to describe something that is fresh, RENEWED, or recently made. It can refer to new things, new moons, or NEW BEGINNINGS. In the context of the Hebrew Bible, "chadash" often signifies A RENEWAL or a fresh start, whether it be a new covenant, a new heart, or a new creation. biblehub.com/hebrew/2319.htm

@@carlgallups I am not entirely convinced but I do appreciate the fact you take the time to reply. Kudos to you.

@@bertgoat Thank you for your kind appreciation. The bottom line. Messianic Rabbi Zev Porat, who has spoken Hebrew as his native language - all his life, and still lives in Israel - agrees that this is exactly what it means. In fact, every single Feast of the Lord in Lev. 23 is also called a "miqra" in Hebrew. A miqra means a rehearsal. Its usually called a Holly Convocation in English translation,. beside being called a Feast (moed) as well. A rehearsal is just a shadow of the real thing. Yeshua is the real thing that the miqra was for. Colossians 2 says those exact words. So - again my antique car illustration I used in the sermon is correct. And Strong's even says that is is often used that exact way. So taking all things together regarding the Old and New covenant the use of Chadash here means exactly what I preached. Even Yeshua preached about the Old and New wineskins with old wine and fresh, robust wine. One was old, the other was new - but the new was STILL wine, but much better. At any rate. Thanks for listening and your kind words. Blessings. C.G.

🛐

That teaching is horribly sloppy exegesis. None of that teaching contextually lines up with the clear teaching of the Word of God. That's my quick answer (so the ones who say it is nonsense and the coversation ends - are right!) Lol! To unwrap all the false teaching would indeed take a "book". I'll keep it in mind, however your final assessment is that this has NOTHING to do with salvation, our current obedience, and the soon coming of Yeshua HaMashiach. This is why I'm continually teaching the principle of Hebrews 12 - FIX YOUR EYES on JESUS...always. It's all about Him, His Word, our walk and ambassadorship in His kingdom. God bless you Allan! Shalom aleichem! C.G.

@carlgallups Thank you. It's kinda like an itch you have to scratch. I believe that's partly what took you into ministry? You get into topics others don't want to cover. Thank you for replying, and I anxiously await the book. Going to switch over now so I can catch your teaching today live. Thanks again, and God Bless. Allan

I know, right? The answer is because this is Satan's world until Yeshua makes all things new. In the meantime, these last days are filled with deception of the worse kind - like nothing the world has seen. AND... we don't know what we don't know! Even the very elect would soon be deceived - if that were possible. Fix you eyes on Jesus. God bless you JungleJargon! C.G.

Thank YOU for your kind words! God bless. C.G.